Digital therapy is here to stay. By the time the COVID-19 epidemic hit, therapy supplements were already gaining popularity among people struggling with stress to serious mental illness. As offices became more virtual, they secured their place in the mental health space. Although some programs like Talkspace և Betterhelp link you to a licensed therapist, a significant portion of the market has remained completely inhumane. Friendly chatbots offer cognitive behavioral therapy; Mood tracers prompt users with bipolar disorder to monitor their mood. Post-traumatic stress disorder treatment programs claim that people are accompanied by acute episodes of deep breathing exercises.
New technology has the potential to help people with poor mental health recognize and manage the symptoms of mental illness. This is a huge benefit when mental health care is almost impossible for half of Americans with mental illness. PsyberGuide, a site that provides evidence-based reviews of mental health practices. S programs can provide many things that traditional therapy often cannot. They are usually cheaper and do not require relocation. Some studies suggest that selected programs may be an effective treatment for mental illness. At the same time, experts are concerned about the rapidly growing non-regulatory market for these applications.
Without a regulator that actively scrutinizes mental health apps, users are left with a blast of options that range from what experts suggest to potentially harmful. “There are a lot of claims that can be made to accurately reflect what these products actually offer,” says Mohringer. “It’s a wild west.”
The mental health market (also known as “health”) has grown at an alarming rate, says John on Torus, an assistant professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School. Mental health programs have been around for as long as the devices that offer them, but since 2016, digital tools have exploded in both quantity and popularity. There are approximately 10,000 to 20,000 mental health apps available today, according to the American Psychological Association. And the COVID-19 epidemic is likely to give the market an extra boost, Toros added. Over the past year, Americans have only become more receptive to the idea of using technology to take care of their health.
[Related: Meditation isn’t always calming. For a select few, it may lead to psychosis.]
Despite the recent popularity of mHealth applications, not all mental health providers use them. Properly developed, these technologies help improve the mental health and well-being of their users. For example, in 2017, Torous միջազգային, an international team of psychologists, collected data on the effectiveness of 22 different smartphone applications. All the data they collected came from randomized controlled trials, the gold standard of scientific evidence that randomly assigned participants to a treatment or non-treatment group. Their findings, published in the journal World Psychiatry, found that, in general, the smartphone apps they rated helped people feel moderately less depressed. Other analyzes have found similar results. Mental health supplements can help people feel less anxious, reduce the symptoms of schizophrenia, and even quit smoking.
Some studies analyzed by Torous և and his colleagues even suggest that mHealth supplements may be just as or more effective than personal therapy, although Torous says the latter result should be taken with salty grains. : A group of work published since 2017 suggests that these programs work best when combined with personal therapy. In addition, he adds, these clinical trials are not fully generalized to the average user experience of the app. For example, test participants may be more motivated to participate in the mHealth treatment program. The average user, by comparison, tends to stay with the mHealth app for about two weeks, says Torus.
And for people who need more practical treatment, mHealth can help guide them to personalized therapy. “It can provide such a good foot in the door,” said Colin Styles-Shields, a professor of psychiatry at Rush University Medical Center. After all, looking for a mental health treatment is still variegated. An app can be an easy և discreet first step.
The number of mental health programs tested by scientists is pale in comparison to the abundance available there. And it is almost impossible to distinguish what is legal or not.
“Wild West” of digital health applications
Technically, mHealth applications for medical health advice are considered medical devices by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Generally, app developers can file treatment claims without going through the FDA, as the regulator applies what is called a “regulatory discretion” to mHealth apps. Because the risks associated with using additives are relatively low, the FDA has a flawless approach to the health market. If the agency focused on a particularly malicious application, the FDA would have the right to take the program from various application stores. In practice, however, the large volume of FDA applications և limited capacity means that many applications make unreasonable demands են cope with it, says Torus. “No one seems to be verifying the veracity of their claims,” he wrote in a text message.
In a study of 52 anxiety supplements, an international team of psychologists found that sixty-seven percent developed without the guidance of a health care professional. In another study of anxiety supplements, researchers found that straight zero out of the top 25 anxiety programs contained any content that matched evidence-based therapies.
“Literally anyone can develop and market one of these programs,” says Moehringer. “Sometimes it is difficult for professionals to differentiate, especially future consumers who are just looking for some relief,” he added.
Some of the tips offered by these programs can be completely harmful. A review published in the journal Medical Medical Research in 2015 that analyzed the quality of mHealth applications found that a program for bipolar disorder (the study did not name any program) advised users living with a manic episode to “shoot from a sore throat.” to help them sleep. Another program warned that “sometimes bipolar disorder can be passed on to another relative if they spend too much time with you listening to your depressive life.”
Torous is also concerned about data privacy. Many health programs collect mental health data to monetize advertising, says Torus. “The biggest possible risk is unknown. What will happen to your data in the future? ” she says. In 2020, hackers attacked the Vastaamo Mental Health Clinic, which digitally duplicated all of its client data, demanding ransom from some 30,000 attending և former patients, threatening to leak their therapy notes. Torous worries that mHealth app data may also be vulnerable.
[Related: Are hyperbaric chambers really a fountain of youth?]
2012 year, Moehringer started working at the non-profit Psyberguide, which offers an objective և evidence-based review of mHealth applications. He և two other psychologists tangled up in the app store և tested mHealth apps to study data privacy, whether developers consulted with experts և to include evidence-based content. Times from time to time it was a frustrating job. He was reviewing hundreds of programs, knowing that his investment was just a bucket. With the transformation of technology, the organization was unable to continue funding. Psyberguide continues to shake, but not fast enough to include a comprehensive, up-to-date portrait of the market, experts say.
MHealth supplements are unlikely to surpass therapy, says Torus. Research suggests that most people are open to using these programs, but prefer to meet with a mental health professional in person. However, when choosing apps, Torous advises you to be careful. Sites like Mindapps.org offer information on hundreds of applications, including data privacy. Users trying to find out if the app is evidence-based should skip their own internet research, Torus says. “It is becoming more and more difficult to determine whether the program is effective,” he said. In addition, he says, many application developers conduct their own research, which is a conflict of interest. Instead, he advises you to see a doctor, such as a doctor or psychologist, to see what they recommend. At the very least, a specialist can look at the supplement to make sure it is compatible with evidence-based treatments.
After all, the task of indexing ին verifying mHealth applications should not fall on the shops of small, non-commercial organizations or government regulators. Markets may require app developers to submit their products for testing to assert mental health or well-being, he says. At the very least, they could require developers to work under the guidance of a licensed professional. Mohringer does not see this happening in the near future. The regulation will almost certainly eliminate most healthcare applications, while dramatically increasing development costs. As a result, the FDA is under pressure to stay out of the software market, he said. Moehringer thinks a reduced barrier քի a bigger barrier for programmers to enter would be a good thing. “We have various tips that oversee all types of medical interventions,” he added. “I see no reason why that model could not be repeated here.”